"The Curve Can't Be Straight․․․"
“It is better not to promise you than to promise
and do not do it” Solomon
“Due” to the moral average of our country's statistical population, we were unable to implement even the elements of democratic governance.
For nearly 30 years, starting with the first president and ending with the current prime minister of the parliamentary republic, all the leaders and their stewards, that is, representatives of the country's so-called political, socio-economic, spiritual-cultural and public elite (the "cream of the nation"), have shown in practice how one can fool the “beloved” people with their dogmatic slogans and the insistence of talking about “good and evil” while pursuing their evil interests. This process instills feelings of hatred, intolerance, and despair in society.
At the same time, the “cream of the nation”, by its own example of using public and state advantages and opportunities, brings together the representatives of a certain segment of the population (regardless of social class) who instinctively yearn to be deceived by the “authorities”.
As a rule, representatives of our nation abroad are distinguished by their reasonableness, hard work, law-abiding and patriotism. And in our own country, we mainly have a semi-literate, ambitious-arrogant provincial, a moderate criminal demagogue who practices his essence with alien humanitarian ideas. As a rule, we are now alien to the compassion for our neighbor. We are even ready to solve our problems at his expense; It should be remembered, "All human affairs are for his mouth, and his soul is not surfeit."
At every opportunity, we are ready to talk about personal freedom, justice, and human rights, and in our daily lives we "do not know what we are doing."
The aforementioned part of our society was formed at the beginning of the Third Republic's establishment under the influence of the ANM ideology, which later developed into a complete worldview of "anarchy".
Neither the second nor the third presidents have condemned the ANM ideology. Moreover, during the reign of the Third President, the worldview of "permissiveness" has reached an absolute level, on the basis of which the present society is going to build an authoritarian regime through "street democracy".
"Street democracy" does not imply the personal responsibility of each participant to express their feelings and behaviors. In the mass, a person loses his personality and obeys the general rules of the crowd.
The crowd is an element of unconscious emotion that is capable of destroying everything creative when it is manipulated. It is no coincidence that in the upper echelons it is accepted to call ordinary meeting participants "poghoses". And for the prime minister, the “poghoses” are human consumables that are needed to achieve their own goal of monopoly.
Interestingly, is there any research body in our country that is capable of assessing the level of national harm (during the years of independence) in the scientific, technical, spiritual-cultural, professional, and most importantly, moral areas, due to the constant degradation of the population?
Most likely, native society is subject to objective and subjective circumstances, such as low demands for moral standards of education in society;lack of a sustainable education system and professional staff training system;the lack of state thinking among the "authorities" and so on,has lost the ability to produce worthy representatives of the public.
Representatives of the "World of Anarchy", seeking to provide foreign education for themselves and their children, do not consider that vocational education does not guarantee the development of a full individuality for the good of the homeland.
When a civil servant of any degree with a provincial mindset, armed with false-revolutionary slogans, at the request of the day "shapes" the present and future of the country to his own taste, unconditionally obeying the inadequate decisions of his like, but superior "guru", or as a rule, not always with adequate social networks and "street democracy", we will never build a society with high moral values, made up of proud (now fashionable) citizens.
We, Armenians, do not have the moral right to be an "ignorant crowd".
P.S. The above mentioned was vividly expressed in Munich during a panel discussion between the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia N. Pashinyan and President of AzerbaijanH. Aliyev. It is unfortunate that the leader of our country, with his ignorance, confused posture and lack of English, made the ancient and wise Armenian people uncomfortable. At the same time, the services that were obliged to provide information to the head of state, instead of doing their job properly, are trying to present this information defeat as a victory. Gentlemen, if you are not ready for discussions of this level, it is better to avoid them…
Who is to blame?
The "Blacks", the "Whites" and the Cheated Majority
Is the process of defining customs value “transparent”?
Մաքսային արժեքի որոշման գործընթացը «թափանցի՞կ» է
BLESSED ARE THOSE WHO BELIEVE
Law is the law
Is there a Prophet without honour except in his own country?
Volunteerism and Volunteers. Methodological manual
SOCIAL SURVEY PROCEDURE